Who is online?
In total there are 3 users online :: 1 Registered, 0 Hidden and 2 Guests :: 2 Botsjacksonccs
Most users ever online was 40 on Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:04 pm
Latest topics
» WTS Nikon SB-600 Free Diffuser, TRAND-IN ACCEPTED (Nikon)by jacksonccs Today at 10:41 am
» WTS Lowepro Computrekker AW Backpack (Notebook), COD MELAKA or Poslaju
by jacksonccs Today at 10:39 am
» WTS Tamron 28-75 f2.8 non motor for Nikon FullFram, Focusing faster than motor version.
by jacksonccs Today at 10:38 am
» WTS Nikon D5000 + Kit + Flashlight + AA Battery, COD MELAKA or Poslaju
by jacksonccs Today at 10:35 am
» [WTS] Vanguard Up-Rise 43
by jacksonccs Today at 10:32 am
» WTS Tamron 90mm F2.8 Nikon Mount
by jacksonccs Today at 10:30 am
» Dry Box Value
by chaukian Sat Apr 28, 2012 7:05 am
» finding the correct lens
by damen Thu Apr 12, 2012 1:03 am
» [ August ] Post your daily photo
by misfit_hau Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:41 pm
» Tanjung Sepat Legacy
by simmon Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:26 pm
» Krabi Trip
by simmon Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:25 pm
» Lets welcome the new NIKON D4
by simmon Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:25 pm
» Holacanthus ciliaris
by simmon Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:24 pm
» Did you hear about this WVIL camera?
by covetus56 Tue Dec 27, 2011 3:13 pm
» Sense of humour
by simmon Fri Dec 09, 2011 2:17 pm
Top posters
| simmon (5065) | ||||
| CY (4147) | ||||
| maxgoh (2938) | ||||
| jonathan (1520) | ||||
| Jameslye (1072) | ||||
| Fred (964) | ||||
| Hanne (935) | ||||
| derricklim (791) | ||||
| changshong (721) | ||||
| Avex (656) |
Are those bright f1.4 lenses realy tat gud?
Page 1 of 1 • Share •
Are those bright f1.4 lenses realy tat gud?
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/en/Our-publications/DxOMark-Insights/F-stop-blues
Tuesday November 23 2010
F-stop blues
For years, lens makers have fought hard to market lenses of wider and wider aperture. Wide apertures (e.g., f /1.4 instead of f /2) but a series of measurement published on dxomark.com cast some doubts on the real benefits, for digitally equipped photographers, of these progresses.
Loss of light at wider aperture
“We have been very surprised,” explained Frédéric Guichard, chief scientist at DxO Labs, “to find out that some of the gain from wider lens openings seems to be offset by the present state of sensor technology. Our measurements all point in the same direction: as you go further than f/ 4 – to f /2 and wider, the accrued quantity of light falls marginally onto the sensor. A stronger and stronger part of this additional light is blocked or lost. I am therefore inclined to question the real benefit of faster lenses.”
This loss seems to increase when the pixel size decreases, as shown on the figure below.

ΔEV at f/1.4 function of pixel pitch
Some sensors can have a loss of more than 1 Ev at f/1.2.

ΔEV at f/1.2 function of pixel pitch
Raising ISO to compensate light loss
A further assessment is still more troubling. It seems that many camera makers are raising the ISO sensitivity when the lens opening is at its widest, probably to cover up the lack of efficiency. “We have ascertained,” explained Guichard, “that on many cameras, the ISO is pushed up on the order of 1/3 to 1/2 stop when the lens opening comes close to its upper limit.

Sensor gain function of f/# (expressed in Ev)
“Accordingly, the photographer has no way to detect that he/she has not benefited from the increase of light transmitted. Of course this increase in ISO translates into other downfalls – mainly in accrued noise. But these remain unknown to the operator,
“We can suspect,” Guichard continued, “that sensors collect the incoming light all the more improperly, in that this light comes from a more oblique angle. Since faster lens have, by definition, a wider opening, they raise the proportion of oblique light, hence the proportion of lost energy which never lands on the pixels.”
DxO Mark measurements are based on an assessment of the effective T-stop for every camera-lens combination. T-stop, a measurement widely used in the industry, especially the motion picture industry, is a measurement of the effective quantity of light transmitted by the lens at a certain f-stop. Thus, T-stop takes into account every reflection or absorption due to the lens. It can be considered as an effective (versus theoretical) way of measuring the aperture.
A possible conclusion of DxO Labs’ measurements is that photographers should consider with caution the maximum f-numbers advertised for lenses. Indeed, depending on the performance of their camera body and sensor, they may not effectively benefit as they expect from such wide apertures.
Tuesday November 23 2010
F-stop blues
For years, lens makers have fought hard to market lenses of wider and wider aperture. Wide apertures (e.g., f /1.4 instead of f /2) but a series of measurement published on dxomark.com cast some doubts on the real benefits, for digitally equipped photographers, of these progresses.
Loss of light at wider aperture
“We have been very surprised,” explained Frédéric Guichard, chief scientist at DxO Labs, “to find out that some of the gain from wider lens openings seems to be offset by the present state of sensor technology. Our measurements all point in the same direction: as you go further than f/ 4 – to f /2 and wider, the accrued quantity of light falls marginally onto the sensor. A stronger and stronger part of this additional light is blocked or lost. I am therefore inclined to question the real benefit of faster lenses.”
This loss seems to increase when the pixel size decreases, as shown on the figure below.

ΔEV at f/1.4 function of pixel pitch
Some sensors can have a loss of more than 1 Ev at f/1.2.

ΔEV at f/1.2 function of pixel pitch
Raising ISO to compensate light loss
A further assessment is still more troubling. It seems that many camera makers are raising the ISO sensitivity when the lens opening is at its widest, probably to cover up the lack of efficiency. “We have ascertained,” explained Guichard, “that on many cameras, the ISO is pushed up on the order of 1/3 to 1/2 stop when the lens opening comes close to its upper limit.

Sensor gain function of f/# (expressed in Ev)
“Accordingly, the photographer has no way to detect that he/she has not benefited from the increase of light transmitted. Of course this increase in ISO translates into other downfalls – mainly in accrued noise. But these remain unknown to the operator,
“We can suspect,” Guichard continued, “that sensors collect the incoming light all the more improperly, in that this light comes from a more oblique angle. Since faster lens have, by definition, a wider opening, they raise the proportion of oblique light, hence the proportion of lost energy which never lands on the pixels.”
DxO Mark measurements are based on an assessment of the effective T-stop for every camera-lens combination. T-stop, a measurement widely used in the industry, especially the motion picture industry, is a measurement of the effective quantity of light transmitted by the lens at a certain f-stop. Thus, T-stop takes into account every reflection or absorption due to the lens. It can be considered as an effective (versus theoretical) way of measuring the aperture.
A possible conclusion of DxO Labs’ measurements is that photographers should consider with caution the maximum f-numbers advertised for lenses. Indeed, depending on the performance of their camera body and sensor, they may not effectively benefit as they expect from such wide apertures.

chaukian- Captain

- Join date: 2009-10-30
Age: 23
Location: Hometown: Muar, currently in mmu melaka
Re: Are those bright f1.4 lenses realy tat gud?
Read about this before buying my first f/1.4 lens. But after buy also still no regrets haha.
_________________
My own page on Facebook, www.facebook.com/CYPixels


CY- Space Ensign

- Join date: 2009-09-06
Age: 25
Location: Melaka
Re: Are those bright f1.4 lenses realy tat gud?
but i stil dun quite get what they are trying to say...
does tat mean we get underexpose pics if we shoot a f1.4 in aperture mode?
does tat mean we get underexpose pics if we shoot a f1.4 in aperture mode?

chaukian- Captain

- Join date: 2009-10-30
Age: 23
Location: Hometown: Muar, currently in mmu melaka
Re: Are those bright f1.4 lenses realy tat gud?
I'll try to explain based on my explanation.
They are just trying to highlight that f/1.4 -> f/2 -> f/2.8
Basically f/1.4 is 1 stop faster than f/2, and 2 stops faster than f/2.8 right? But actual condition it is not that. A little lesser due to light loss on big aperture.
What the company does is they secretly increase ISO to compensate. Meaning, let's say 200 ISO, it is actually 400 ISO or something (I don't know the right amount, but ISO is increased) to compensate for the light loss.
They are just trying to highlight that f/1.4 -> f/2 -> f/2.8
Basically f/1.4 is 1 stop faster than f/2, and 2 stops faster than f/2.8 right? But actual condition it is not that. A little lesser due to light loss on big aperture.
What the company does is they secretly increase ISO to compensate. Meaning, let's say 200 ISO, it is actually 400 ISO or something (I don't know the right amount, but ISO is increased) to compensate for the light loss.
_________________
My own page on Facebook, www.facebook.com/CYPixels


CY- Space Ensign

- Join date: 2009-09-06
Age: 25
Location: Melaka
Re: Are those bright f1.4 lenses realy tat gud?
icic...now i understand edi...just nw i gt google a bit on this...thanks ya CY..
So this news is spreading and letters hv been sent to companies that are involved to get the truth on this...
This is just a guess from Dxolab anyway...lets wait for the truth n see how...
Looking back, i got quite a number of underexposed pics when using my f1.4 lens at aperture mode without any flash...if we use flash we wont even notice anything...
So this news is spreading and letters hv been sent to companies that are involved to get the truth on this...
This is just a guess from Dxolab anyway...lets wait for the truth n see how...
Looking back, i got quite a number of underexposed pics when using my f1.4 lens at aperture mode without any flash...if we use flash we wont even notice anything...

chaukian- Captain

- Join date: 2009-10-30
Age: 23
Location: Hometown: Muar, currently in mmu melaka
Similar topics» Ultra bright LED's
» Are those bright f1.4 lenses realy tat gud?
» Bunny Glasses at Abbie Bright's Traveling Caravan?
» Star Light Star Bright
» Nikon D3100 and Nikkor 85mm, 24-120mm, 28-300mm, 55-300mm lenses
» Are those bright f1.4 lenses realy tat gud?
» Bunny Glasses at Abbie Bright's Traveling Caravan?
» Star Light Star Bright
» Nikon D3100 and Nikkor 85mm, 24-120mm, 28-300mm, 55-300mm lenses
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum